Images
These images can be found in the article Pivotal Role of Spin in Celestial Body Motion Mechanics.
TABLE IIa |
||||||
PLANETS |
SATELLITES |
|||||
|
MASS |
AXIAL ROT. SPEED |
|
DIST. FROM MOTHER |
MASS* |
ORBITAL SPEED (Km/hr) |
1) Mars
|
0.642 |
867 |
Phobos |
9.38 |
10.6 |
7,695 |
2) Earth
|
5.97 |
1677 |
Moon |
384.4 |
0.073 |
3,679 |
3) Uranus
|
86.8 |
9,310 |
Miranda |
129.9 |
0.66 |
23,923 |
4) Neptune
|
102 |
10,231 |
Naiad |
23.2 |
0.002 |
43,350 |
5) Saturn
|
568 |
17,775 |
Mimas |
185.5 |
0.379 |
51,684 |
6) Jupiter
|
1899 |
45,255 |
Io |
421.6 |
893.2 |
62,382 |
Data presented in this table were adapted from http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/factsheet and related pages. Only for the moon was actual value derived from the NASA’s website; all other values were calculated from the values for the orbital parameters posted at the website. For calculating the orbits of the small satellites, where only semi-major axes were provided, they were used; since all satellites’ values were thus affected, we accepted that limitation.
*The masses for all of the planets and earth’s moon were x10 24 kg and for the satellites of Mars were x 1015 kg; for Jupiter’s moons were x 1021 kg; for Saturn’s, Uranus’ and Neptune’s were x 1020 kg
TABLE II b |
||||||
PLANETS |
SATELLITES |
|||||
|
MASS |
AXIAL ROT. |
|
MASS* |
DIST. FROM |
AXIAL. ROT. |
MARS |
0.642 |
867 |
PHOBOS |
10.6 |
9.38 |
9.33 |
EARTH |
5.97 |
1,677 |
MOON |
0.073 |
384.4 |
16.7 |
URANUS |
86.8 |
9,130 |
MIRANDA |
0.66 |
129.9 |
44 |
NEPTUNE
|
102 |
10,231 |
NAIAD |
0.002 |
23.2 |
31.5 |
SATURN
|
568 |
17,775 |
MIMAS |
0.379 |
185.5 |
51.6 |
JUPITER |
1899 |
42,255 |
IO |
893.2 |
421.6 |
269.6 |
Data in this table were adapted from http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/factsheet and related pages. Only for the moon was actual values derived from NASA’s website; all other values were calculated from the values for the orbital parameters posted on that site. For calculating the axial rotation speeds, either using the ‘median axis radius’ given by NASA, or by calculating it from the data provided (for the small satellites, where their shapes are not spherical) were used to determine the circumference. Since the satellites were synchronously rotating, for axial rotation period, the orbital period was used. Then, the satellites’ orbital rotation was calculated from the two values. * The masses for satellites of Mars were x1015 kg; for moon it was x1024 kg, for Uranus’, Neptune’s and Saturn’s were x1020 kg; for Jupiter’s they were 1021 kg.
Reproduced from Applied Phys. Res. Vol 12, No 2, 2020
http://dx.dol.org/10.5539/apr.c12n2p
TABLE III
ORBITAL PARAMETERS OF SATELLITES OF JUPITER*
C = Newly discovered satellites S/2000 J2 to S/2011 J2 have orbital periods from 504 to 982.5; all exhibit reverse ‘motion’ and orbital inclination from 140.8 to 165. Numerous peripheral newly discovered unnamed satellite are not included in this Table. Most of them rotate negatively.
S=Synchronous rotation (rotation period is the same as orbital period) R=Retrograde rotation ND= No data available Δ Distance from Jupiter (103km) = Semi-major Axis*Adapted from:http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/factsheet/joviansatfact.html 16 July 201 Reproduced with kind permission of Physics Essays Publication, http://physicsessays.org/ with modifications.
Satellites: |
Radius |
Distance from Jupiter Δ |
Orbital Period |
Rotation Period |
Inclination |
A) Galilean: |
|
|
|
|
|
Io |
1,821.6 |
421.8 |
1.769138 |
S |
0.04 |
Europa |
1,560.8 |
671.1 |
3.551181 |
S |
0.47 |
Ganymede |
2,631.2 |
1,070.4 |
7.154553 |
S |
0.18 |
Callisto |
2,410.3 |
1,882.7 |
16.689017 |
S |
0.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
B) ‘Lesser’ |
|
|
|
|
|
Metis |
30x20x17 |
128 |
0.294779 |
S |
0.06 |
Adrastea |
10x8x7 |
129 |
0.298260 |
S |
0.03 |
Amalthea |
125x73x64 |
181.4 |
0.498179 |
S |
0.40 |
Thebe |
58x49x42 |
221.9 |
0.6745 |
S |
0.8 |
Themisto |
4 |
7,507 |
132.02 |
ND |
45.67 |
Leda |
5 |
11,170 |
240.92 |
ND |
27.47 |
Himalia |
85 |
11,460 |
250.5662 |
0.4 |
27.63 |
Lysithea |
12 |
11,720 |
259.22 |
ND |
27.35 |
Elara |
40 |
11,740 |
259.6528 |
0.5 |
24.77 |
Euporie |
1 |
19,390 |
553.1 R |
ND |
147 |
Harpalyke |
2.2 |
21,110 |
623.3 R |
ND |
148.7 |
Praxidike |
3.4 |
21,150 |
625.3 R |
ND |
148.7 |
Iocaste |
2.6 |
21,270 |
631.5 R |
ND |
159.7 |
Ananke |
10 |
21,280 |
629.8 R |
ND |
148.9 |
Arche |
1.5 |
22,930 |
723.9 R |
ND |
165 |
Pasithee |
1 |
23,100 |
716.3 R |
ND |
165.4 |
Kale |
1 |
23,220 |
729.5 R |
ND |
165 |
Isonoe |
1.9 |
23,220 |
725.5 R |
ND |
165 |
Erinome |
1.6 |
23,280 |
728.3 R |
ND |
164.9 |
Taygete |
2.5 |
23,360 |
732.2 R |
ND |
165.2 |
Carme |
15 |
23,400 |
734.2 R |
ND |
164.9 |
Kalyke |
2.6 |
23,580 |
743 R |
ND |
165.2 |
Pasiphae |
18 |
23,620 |
743.6 R |
ND |
151.4 |
Megaclite |
2.7 |
23,810 |
752.8 R |
ND |
152.8 |
Callirrhoe |
4 |
24,100 |
758.8 R |
ND |
147.1 |
Cyllene |
2 |
24,350 |
737.8 R |
ND |
149.3 |
SELECTED PARAMETERS OF STARS IN SUN’S NEIGHBORHOOD |
|||||
STAR |
DISTANCE |
RADIUS* |
MASS* |
RAD.VEL |
ROT. VEL |
1) Proxima Centauri |
4.24 |
0.154 |
0.122 |
-22.20 |
<0.1 |
2) Alpha Centauri A |
4.37 |
1.22 |
1.1 |
-21.4 |
2.7+-0.7 |
3) Alpha Centauri B |
4.37 |
0.86 |
0.907 |
-18.6 |
1.1+-0,8 |
4) Barnaard’s star |
5.96 |
0.196 |
0.144 |
-110.6 |
<2.5 |
5) Wolf 359 |
7.86 |
0.16 |
0.09 |
+19 |
<3.0 |
6) Sirius A |
8.6 |
1.71 |
2.063 |
-5.5 |
16 |
7) Luyten 726-8 |
8.73 |
0.14 |
0.102 |
+29 |
28.2 |
8) Ross 154 |
9.6 |
0.24 |
0.17 |
-10.7 |
3.5 |
9) Ross 248 |
10.29 |
0.16 |
0.136 |
-75.2 |
1.2 |
10) Ross 128 |
11 |
0.197 |
0.168 |
-31 |
N/A |
11) 61 Cygni A |
11.4 |
0.665 |
0.7 |
-65.9 |
N/A |
12) 61 Cygni B |
11.4 |
0.595 |
0.63 |
-64.4 |
N/A |
13) Procyon A |
11.46 |
2.05 |
1.50 |
-3.2 |
3.16 |
14) Epsilon Indi |
11.87 |
0.732 |
0.754 |
-40.4 |
1.46 |
15) Vega |
25 |
2.36 x 2.82 |
2.1 |
-13.9 |
20.48 |
16) Arcturus |
36.7 |
25.4 |
1.08 |
-5.19 |
2.4 |
17) Aldebaran |
65.3 |
44.13 |
1.16 |
54.26 |
3.5+-1.5 |
18) Beta Carinae |
113.2 |
6.8 |
3.5 |
-5.2 |
145.7 |
19) Achernar |
139 |
7.3 x 11.4 |
6.7 |
+16 |
250 |
20) Alha Arae |
270+-20 |
4.5 |
9.6 |
0 |
375 |
21) Canopus |
310 |
71 |
8 |
+20.3 |
9 |
22) Polaris |
323-433 |
37.5 |
5.4 |
-17 |
14 |
23) Pleione |
392 |
3.2 |
3.4 |
+4.4 |
329 |
24) Epsilon Aurigae |
653-1,500 |
143-358 |
2.2-15 |
10.4 |
54 |
25) PZ Cassiopeiae |
2810 |
1062 |
N/A |
-45.68 |
45 |
26) Rho Cassiopeiae |
~3,400 |
636-981 |
40 |
-47 |
25 |
27) VY Canis Majoris |
~3,820 |
1420 |
17 |
41 |
300 |
28) KY Cygni |
~3,600 |
672 |
25 |
N/A |
N/A |
29) UY Scuti |
~5,100 |
755 |
7-10 |
+18.33 |
18 |
30) V382 Carinae |
5,930 |
485 |
20 |
+6 |
57+-15 (?) |
31) V915 Scorpii |
5436 |
760 |
N/A |
+46 |
N/A |
32) Eta Carinae |
7,500 |
~240 |
120-200 |
-25 |
N/A |
33) VFTS 102 |
164,000 |
N/A |
~25 |
+228 |
610+-30 |
The data for this table were derived from published material online, mainly from Wikipedia.org but, some were confirmed or corrected by values posted in other sites, as well as from nasa.gov website
- = Radius and mass are expressed as multiples of solar radius or solar mass
- N/A= Data not available
SELECTED PARAMETERS OF LARGE GALAXIES |
||||||
Name |
Distance |
Mass* |
Size |
No. of Stars |
Helio-Radial |
Galacto- Centric |
1) 1C 1101 |
1.045 ± |
N/A |
4M |
100 T (1014 ) |
23,368 ± 26 |
23,395 ± 26 |
2) 3C 348 (Hercules A) |
2.1 B |
1,000 * |
1.5M |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
3) A2261 – BCG |
3 B |
10 * |
1M |
10 T (1013) |
N/A |
N/A |
4) ESO 306 – 17 |
493 M |
2.5 arc. Sec |
1M |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
5) UGC 2885 |
232 M |
463 K ly |
800 |
1T |
N/A |
N/A |
6) Comet |
3.2 B |
3.8 x 108 M⊙ |
600K |
N/A |
3.4M |
N/A |
7) NGC 6872 (Condor Gal) |
212 M |
>1011 M⊙ |
522K |
N/A |
4,555 |
4,443 |
8) ESO 444 – 46 |
640 M |
10,000 * |
402K |
N/A |
14,061 |
N/A |
9) Tadpole
|
420 M |
N/A |
280K |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
10)Andromeda |
2.54 M |
1.76 * |
~220K |
1T |
-301 |
- 120 |
11) Milky Way |
_______ |
1x1012 M⊙ |
105.2 |
250-500 |
210 |
N/A |
LY= Light years K= x1000 M= Million B= Billion T= Trillion
N/A = Data not available
⋆ = x Mass of Milky Way Galaxy
M⊙= x Mass of Sun
The data for this table were derived from our review of astronomy/astrophysical journals and various online sites, including nasa.gov, Wikipedia.org and others. There is great paucity of data for the parameters we were particularly interested in (axial rotation speeds and radial velocity, vs mass/size of the galaxies). We tried to select large galaxies and compare them with medium-sized ones such as our Milky Way Galaxy. Apparently, the largest of the galaxies are also the farthest and clearly the availability of data is severely hampered by that fact alone. Thus, on this table we are left with comparison of only a few galaxies (Nos.1,6,7,8 vs 10 & 11). Even with this sparse data, there is a good hint that the galacto-radial and helio-radial velocities are higher, the larger the galaxy is. Taken together with the recent observation (5) of the “Super Spirals” rotating even faster, we can safely predict that future availability of accurate information will confirm our belief.